I'll chalk this up to neither good/bad, but necessary inconvenience for the advancement of Microsoft Flash visitors.lol Ah heck, my swf's perform better in 9 anyways! More ongoing info on how various Adobe apps are being updated for Vista is in the "Vista Compatibility FAQ" linked off the front page of the Adobe Support Center: You can quickly check someone's version by asking them to go to this page: I'd recommend keeping updated on internet software as a matter of course anyway. O "When I click in this little SWF, nothing happens in that other big SWF."
O "I clicked 'yes' to Express Install but nothing happened." It sounds like Justing indicated that complaints like the following could identify someone with an old Player on new OS: I'm not sure what percentage of people will upgrade to Vista, as opposed to doing a clean install of the OS. Player 9.0.28 was available after the Vista release cycle stabilized. The new OS doesn't quite support all existing software as the old OS did, so new releases of software are necessary to "support" Vista. īy WebService //Flash :: Flash Player и Windows Vista on 15:09:03 I wonder if this is good or bad, i can't decide?
Thanks for the heads up, Justin! Commentsīy » Blog Archive » Vista and the Flash plug-in on 18:29:00 In other words, if your users are on Vista and complain that your Flash sites or applications are not working properly, you'll have to tell them to upgrade to the latest player. The areas that are reported as being affected are express install, shared objects, local connection and file reference.īasically, in order for Flash content to play properly on Vista, users must run the latest Flash Player version (9,0,28 or higher).
I just read an informative post on Justin's blog about how older versions of the Flash Player will not work as expected on Microsoft Vista due to changes in the security model. On Vista? You must use the latest Flash Player (9,0,28 or higher)
0 kommentar(er)
